Updated: August 2026
GDPR was built for EU member states, but its influence reaches well beyond Europe. Australia and Canada have introduced their own data protection regulations that mirror GDPR’s core principles, and organisations in either country may need to comply with GDPR directly if they handle the personal data of people in the EU.
• GDPR applies extraterritorially to any organisation handling the personal data of people in the EU, while Australia’s Privacy Act and Canada’s PIPEDA mainly govern organisations operating within their own borders.
• The Australian Privacy Act 1988 and Canada’s PIPEDA share GDPR’s core principles, lawful basis for processing, individual rights, breach notification, but differ in scope: the Privacy Act also reaches foreign entities operating in Australia, while PIPEDA covers Canada’s private sector only.
• Organisations in Australia or Canada that process EU residents’ data need dedicated GDPR measures on top of their domestic obligations, including lawful basis assessments, data subject rights processes, and, for cross-border transfers, safeguards like standard contractual clauses.
Australia’s data protection framework runs on the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), overseen by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC). The Act sets out the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), which govern how Australian organisations collect, use, disclose, and store personal information.
GDPR and the Australian Privacy Act share the same broad goal, but the scope differs. GDPR applies extraterritorially: any organisation processing the personal data of people in the EU falls under it, regardless of where that organisation is based. The Australian Privacy Act, by contrast, primarily applies to Australian organisations and to foreign entities operating in Australia.
Organisations that need to meet GDPR alongside their Australian Privacy Act obligations should focus on three areas:
• Lawful basis for processing: identify a lawful basis for each processing activity, such as consent, contractual necessity, legal obligation, or legitimate interest.
• Data subject rights: give individuals the ability to access, correct, delete, and restrict the processing of their personal data.
• Data breach notification: notify affected individuals and the OAIC without undue delay when a breach poses a risk to people’s rights and freedoms.
We build a data protection compliance solution around each organisation’s specific requirements, including:
• Data mapping and inventory: a detailed inventory of personal data flows, so businesses can spot compliance gaps and put the right safeguards in place.
• Consent management: capturing and recording consent information so individuals have transparency and control over their personal data.
• Data subject rights management: handling access, rectification, and erasure requests efficiently.
Canada’s private sector relies on the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), which governs how organisations collect, use, and disclose personal information nationwide.
PIPEDA shares common principles with GDPR but differs in a few key ways. PIPEDA applies only to the private sector, while GDPR covers both public and private organisations. PIPEDA also lacks GDPR’s extraterritorial reach and focuses mainly on organisations operating within Canada.
Organisations meeting GDPR on top of PIPEDA should focus on:
• Accountability and governance: demonstrate accountability for data processing activities and put appropriate governance in place.
• Data minimisation: collect and retain only the personal data necessary for the intended purpose.
• International data transfers: put safeguards such as standard contractual clauses or binding corporate rules in place before moving personal data outside Canada.
For Canadian organisations, we offer:
• Privacy impact assessments: identifying and mitigating the privacy risks in specific data processing activities.
• Cross-border data transfer management: putting the right safeguards in place to meet GDPR’s requirements for international data transfers.
• Data Protection Officer (DPO) support: guidance in appointing and supporting a DPO, a key GDPR requirement.
Keeping pace with GDPR-style standards matters for organisations operating in Australia and Canada, and getting it right cuts the risk of penalties while building a compliance position that works across jurisdictions.
Get in touch to talk through what GDPR compliance looks like for your organisation in Australia or Canada: info@gdprlocal.com.
No. The Australian Privacy Act 1988 is a separate law from GDPR, and meeting its requirements doesn’t automatically satisfy GDPR. An Australian organisation that processes the personal data of people in the EU must meet GDPR requirements directly, in addition to its Privacy Act obligations.
No. PIPEDA and GDPR share similar principles, but PIPEDA applies only to Canada’s private sector and doesn’t reach outside Canada the way GDPR does. A Canadian company handling EU residents’ data still needs to meet GDPR separately.
Only if they process the personal data of people located in the EU, for example by selling to EU customers, tracking EU website visitors, or storing EU employee data. Companies that operate purely within Australia or Canada, with no EU data, aren’t subject to GDPR.
Disclaimer: This blog post is intended solely for informational purposes. It does not offer legal advice or opinions. This article is not a guide for resolving legal issues or managing litigation on your own. It is not a replacement for professional legal counsel and does not provide legal advice for any specific situation or employer.